<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDA or Traffic Light System?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endiet.com/opinion/gda-or-traffic-light-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endiet.com/opinion/gda-or-traffic-light-system/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.endiet.com/opinion/gda-or-traffic-light-system/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endiet.com/opinion/gda-or-traffic-light-system/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. The traffic light system is SO much easier to understand at a glance, but retailers just don't want to draw attention to the facts with big red 'lights' on packaging. And if people DO think twice before buying something with 4 red lights, surely that's a GOOD thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. The traffic light system is SO much easier to understand at a glance, but retailers just don&#8217;t want to draw attention to the facts with big red &#8216;lights&#8217; on packaging. And if people DO think twice before buying something with 4 red lights, surely that&#8217;s a GOOD thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
